MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electronic civil lawsuit administration -An analytical study-

2025· article· ar· W4410929741 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venueالرافدین للحقوق · 2025
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

تعد الثورة الالكترونية من اهم معالم العصر الحالي والتي القت بضلالها على جميع نواحي الحياة ومن بينها اثرها على مرفق مهم من مرافق المجتمع الا وهو مرفق القضاء من خلال ظهور المحاكم الالكترونية، فقد ساهمت الظروف الصحية الحالية على تشجيع الاتجاه بالأخذ بهذا النظام، فكانت تلك التغييرات الحياتية الدافع نحو ظهور هذا النوع من المحاكم. وبالتالي اصبح من الضروري اعادة النظر في تطبيق النظام القضائي التقليدي، واستبداله بنظام قضائي حديث من خلال استخدام التكنولوجيا في المنظومة القضائية، وذلك لضمان حسن سير مرفق العدالة، وتسريع مختلف الاجراءات القضائية، وضمان جودة المعلومات، تماشياً مع التطور السريع، ويعد التقاضي الإلكتروني من اهم تطبيقات التكنولوجيا الحديثة في مجال العدالة والذي يثير جملة من الاشكالات القانونية والتطبيقية في مختلف الدول.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueالرافدین للحقوقSame topicDispute Resolution and Class ActionsFrench-language works237,207