MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410932262 · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2025.116782

Very high-order symmetric positive-interior quadrature rules on triangles and tetrahedra

2025· article· en· W4410932262 on OpenAlex
Zelalem Arega Worku, Jason E. Hicken, David W. Zingg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsTetrahedronQuadrature (astronomy)Gauss–Jacobi quadratureGauss–Kronrod quadrature formulaOrder (exchange)Clenshaw–Curtis quadratureMathematical analysisCombinatoricsGeometryGaussian quadratureNyström methodIntegral equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present novel fully-symmetric quadrature rules with positive weights and strictly interior nodes that are exact for polynomials of total degrees up to 84 on triangles and 40 on tetrahedra. Initial guesses for solving the nonlinear systems of equations needed to derive quadrature rules are generated by forming tensor-product structures on quadrilateral/hexahedral subdomains of the simplices using the Legendre-Gauss nodes on the first half of the line reference element. In combination with a methodology for node elimination, these initial guesses lead to the development of highly efficient quadrature rules, even for very high polynomial degrees. Using existing estimates of the minimum number of quadrature points for a given degree, we show that the derived quadrature rules on triangles and tetrahedra are more than 95% and 80% efficient, respectively, for almost all degrees. The accuracy of the quadrature rules is demonstrated through numerical examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it