MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410932533 · doi:10.2118/225335-ms

Analysis and Optimization of Zama Field Development Using Integrated Production System Modelling

2025· article· en· W4410932533 on OpenAlexaff
Varun Pathak, Fabiola Vivas Trujillo, Angelos Calogirou, Dario Pederiva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsEnergi Simulation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProduction (economics)Field (mathematics)Systems engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Zama field, located offshore of Mexico, is one of the world's biggest shallow-water oil discoveries in the past 20 years. The field has recoverable volumes of over 700 MBBL of oil. The development plan will include 2 production platforms, 29 oil producers, and 17 water injectors with two 66 km long pipelines to carry the oil to an onshore facility. Given the significance of this field, the use of an IPSM (Integrated Production Systems Modelling) can provide an increased value from this development through better design and operational decisions. The reservoir has conventional 28 °API oil, located in a thick pay with a significant geothermal gradient - Which will have an impact on the performance of the waterflood as water properties will change with temperature. This requires thermal capability in the reservoir simulator. The wellbore and facilities models, including all relevant completions and equipment, were built in a steady-state integrated production system module, that is capable of handling any fluid model. For this project, thermal black oil in both reservoir and facilities was considered the right approach as it will have a better simulation performance than full EOS models. The integrated simulation used explicit coupling between the reservoir and production models, with a "smart" coupling frequency chosen by the integration tool. The workflow allows for multi-fidelity solution to IPSM - and this was utilized in areas such as well and pipeline models where there was a choice to use pressure drop correlations or pipe tables. Even though this is a greenfield development, the analysis had shown that water injection should begin from the start of field development. The base IPSM considered all these aspects, and was optimized for performance. Thereafter, the production and injection strategy (constraints, rates, scheduling, etc.) as well as the overall completion and facilities design (well tubings, pumps, pipeline, risers, etc.) were optimized in an integrated fashion - providing a range of outcomes from the chosen schemes. The workflow yielded a stable IPSM system capable of predicting long-term performance of the Zama field development plan. The workflow was able to integrate subsurface and surface disciplines on a collaborative platform, which drastically reduced the logistical and workflow inefficiencies that exist in traditional IPSM workflows. The advanced fluid handling capabilities, with thermal black oil models in both reservoir and production system proved valuable to enhance the predictability from the model. The workflow captured the complex interactions between facilities and reservoir and the entire system was optimized using a novel end-to-end uncertainty management framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207