MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410933149 · doi:10.1142/s2737599425500082

Some new aspects on COVID-19 transmission dynamics applicable to other epidemics: Insights from mathematical modeling and numerical simulations

2025· article· en· W4410933149 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Ogesa Juma, Chinwendu E. Madubueze, Godwin Nwachukwu Nkem, John Mwaonanji, Joseph Malinzi

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation and Emerging Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Transmission (telecommunications)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Statistical physicsDynamics (music)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakComputer scienceVirologyPhysicsBiologyMedicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a mathematical model is constructed, analyzed, and numerically simulated to investigate the effects of vaccination rates and efficacy on the incidence of COVID-19. The model subdivides the infectious class into symptomatic, asymptomatic, and hospitalized individuals, enabling us to explore questions inadequately addressed by prior models. First, the existence of a region where the model is epidemiologically feasible is established. Then a thorough qualitative analysis is carried out in order to characterize the long-term dynamics of the model solutions, and the model is calibrated using South Africa-reported data from the beginning of the epidemic until July 2022. In addition, different numerical scenarios with different transmission rates, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), and vaccination parameters were investigated. The model, analysis, and results of this study can be adapted to study the dynamics of other epidemics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation and Emerging TechnologiesSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207