MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410935095 · doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100902

Elevation shapes tree composition, structure and diversity more than soil properties in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

2025· article· en· W4410935095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrees Forests and People · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGeorg-August-Universität Göttingen
KeywordsElevation (ballistics)Diversity (politics)Composition (language)Plant diversityGeographyForestrySoil conservationTree (set theory)GeologyEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiodiversityMathematicsArchaeologyBiologyGeometryArtPolitical scienceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite Nepal's steep elevational gradients and ecological diversity, forest stand dynamics along these gradients remain poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze how elevation (1500–4000 m) influences forest properties in the Sikles region of the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. We used generalized additive modeling (GAM) to capture nonlinear patterns in tree diversity and structural attributes across the elevation gradient, and structural equation modeling (SEM) to disentangle the direct and indirect relationships among soil, environmental, and tree variables. Transect-based sampling was conducted using 60 rectangular plots (20 × 25 m) across elevation gradients, spaced at 100 m intervals. Within each plot, we recorded dendrometric attributes (DBH > 5 cm, tree height, canopy cover), soil properties (pH, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and potassium), and environmental variables (slope, aspect, elevation, precipitation, and temperature). Tree diversity and species composition declined with elevation. GAM revealed a significant nonlinear negative effect of elevation on diversity and structural attributes, with a plateau between 2000 and 3000 m and decline above 3000 m. Only organic matter and nitrogen showed weak elevation trends. SEM identified elevation, precipitation and soil nutrients as key drivers of species richness and tree structure. This study recommends habitat protection and sustainable forest management in mid-elevation forests (2000–3000 m) where diversity is highest, and restoration strategies above 3000 m such as assisted regeneration, enrichment planting, and introduction of climate-resilient native species to mitigate ongoing degradation and climate risks. These findings support elevation-based forest management in Nepal’s mountain forests and contribute to global climate-resilient conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it