First national survey of terrestrial biodiversity using airborne eDNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near real-time data across taxa are necessary for quantifying biodiversity at regional to continental scales and evaluating conservation measures. Yet, standardized methods and globally distributed infrastructure are still lacking. In this study, we conducted the first national survey of terrestrial biodiversity using a metabarcoding approach on airborne environmental DNA collected by a national ambient air quality monitoring network. Our goal was to perform a multi-taxonomic biodiversity assessment at a national scale, compare detections with those of another large-scale monitoring approach (citizen sciences) and estimate a tentative minimum eDNA transportation distance. We identified over 1,100 taxa, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists, fungi and plants covering a wide range of life history traits and ecological niches. Citizen science and eDNA detections were complementary, with eDNA better mapping less charismatic and difficult to spot taxa, demonstrating its potential to align with global conservation goals. Airborne eDNA signals were relatively local (< 80 km), likely due to the deposition of the larger particles from the air over shorter distances and limited wind transportation at near ground level. Overall, our results show that molecular protocols integrated into existing air quality monitoring networks can provide standardized, biodiversity monitoring at relatively low field cost, with potential for broad scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".