Mapping the aggregate g-ratio of white matter tracts using multi-modal MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
at the macroscopic scale across the entire human brain using multi-modal MRI and sampled along white matter streamlines reconstructed from diffusion-weighted images to derive the g-ratio of a white matter tract. This tractometry approach has shown spatiotemporal variations in g-ratio across white matter tracts and networks. However, tractometry is biased by partial volume effects where voxels contain multiple fiber populations. To address this limitation, we used the Convex Optimization Modeling for Microstructure Informed Tractography (COMMIT) framework to derive tract-specific axonal and myelin volumes, which are used to compute the tract-specific aggregate g-ratio. We compare our novel COMMIT-based tract-specific g-ratio mapping approach to conventional tractometry in a group of 10 healthy adults. Our findings demonstrate that the tract-specific g-ratio mapping approach preserves the overall spatial distribution observed in tractometry and enhances contrast between tracts. Additionally, our scan-rescan data show high repeatability for medium to large caliber tracts. We show that short and large caliber tracts have a lower g-ratio, whereas tractometry results show the opposite trends. This technique advances tract-specific analysis by reducing biases introduced by the complex network of crossing white matter fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".