MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410948848 · doi:10.58931/cait.2025.5178

Updates in Epinephrine Guidelines

2025· article· en· W4410948848 on OpenAlexaffabout
Susan Waserman, Heather Cruickshank

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian allergy & immunology today. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpinephrineComputer scienceMedicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epinephrine is the first line treatment for anaphylaxis, which is a serious allergic reaction that can rapidly progress and may cause death. As a nonselective adrenergic agonist, epinephrine rapidly works to increase vasoconstriction and peripheral vascular resistance, increase cardiac output, reverse bronchoconstriction and mucosal edema, and inhibit the release of mediators of inflammation from mast cells and basophils. The anaphylaxis guidelines developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters (JTFPP) in 2020, the World Allergy Organization (WAO) in 2020, and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) in 2021 advise clinicians to prescribe self-injectable epinephrine to individuals at risk of anaphylaxis and educate them on when and how to administer it. In 2023, the JTFPP updated its anaphylaxis practice parameter to address seven key topic areas, including multiple questions and recommendations related to epinephrine prescription and use. The practice parameter authors graded each recommendation as conditional or strong, based in part on the certainty of the supporting evidence. We provide an overview of key recommendations and discuss their applications in the Canadian context. It is important to note that in Canada, EpiPen® autoinjectors are currently the sole epinephrine delivery devices available with premeasured doses of epinephrine for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions. These autoinjectors should be administered intramuscularly into the anterolateral thigh. Additional epinephrine devices may become available in the future, including the first epinephrine nasal spray (neffy®). There is a wider variety of epinephrine devices available in the United States, including multiple brands of epinephrine autoinjectors (Adrenaclick®, Auvi-Q®, EpiPen®/EpiPen® Jr., and generic versions). Additionally, there is one brand of epinephrine prefilled syringe (Symjepi™) and one brand of nasal spray (neffy®). Although the anaphylaxis practice parameter update was published before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had approved neffy®, we believe its recommendations for epinephrine prescription and use may be appropriately extended to include epinephrine nasal spray where it is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian allergy & immunology today.Same topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207