MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410949634 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319409

Quality Management Systems implementation in public medical laboratories; A sustainable approach to health system strengthening in Lagos State, Nigeria

2025· article· en· W4410949634 on OpenAlexaff
Tolulope Adaran, Olanrewaju Jenrola, Feyisayo Ebenezer Jegede, OA Ojo, Adebayo Bakare, Olakunle Omiyale, Felix Olaniyi Sanni, Omoh A Aliu

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsCanadore College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditChecklistBaseline (sea)Public healthMedicineDocumentationPsychological interventionQuality management systemDescriptive statisticsCertificationRating systemQuality managementFamily medicineBusinessMedical educationOperations managementManagement systemNursingPsychologyEngineeringPolitical scienceAccountingStatisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Quality Management Systems (QMS) in public medical laboratories is crucial to ensure quality and reliable testing outcomes for quality healthcare. This research aims to achieve a minimum of 2 Stars WHO-AFRO rating at the external audit of ten public medical Laboratories within twelve months of intervention using improved documentation and institutionalization of robust QMS. METHOD: A quasi-experimental design was used to assess QMS interventions in ten of 28 public secondary medical laboratories in Lagos State. These facilities were randomly selected using non-probability measures over 12 months from November 2022 to October 2023. The study measured resource allocation, conducted staff training for capacity building, and provided mentoring support. External audits were performed using the WHO-AFRO SLIPTA 2015 checklist, with a grading system from 0 to 5 stars. The data collected included baseline and post-intervention scores, analyzed using descriptive statistics and baseline compared with follow-up audit performance. RESULT: The 12-month implementation of laboratory QMS in ten Lagos State's public secondary health facilities revealed substantial progress. Nine Medical laboratories in the study had a baseline WHO-AFRO rating of 0 Star, while General Hospital Ikorodu had a baseline rating of 1 Star. Sixty percent of the medical laboratories demonstrated commendable QMS improvement and achieved 3 Stars WHO-AFRO rating each, while twenty percent of the medical laboratories attained 2-Stars each. However, the remaining twenty percent of the health facilities achieved minimal improvements, securing 1 Star WHO-AFRO rating each. CONCLUSION: Overall, Eighty percent of the medical laboratories showed progress in QMS implementation in Lagos State. The study reveals that a Government-led QMS implementation drives a more sustainable culture of quality in medical laboratories and the twelve-month measure indicates the possibility to extend the QMS interventions to the remaining eighteen public medical laboratories in Lagos State.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207