MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410953239 · doi:10.3390/ijms26115343

Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1

2025· article· en· W4410953239 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohui Cai, Honglin Chen, Jing Fang, Meijuan Xu, Meijuan Chen, Qiancheng Qi, Peng Xu, Patrick C. Hanington, Xinzhong Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBeibu Gulf UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransactivationTranscription factorBiologyE2FDNA-binding domainNuclear localization sequenceGeneNLSTranscription (linguistics)Cell biologyGeneticsMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E2F transcription factors regulate cell cycle progression by influencing the expression of proteins required for the G1-S phase transition and DNA synthesis with its heterodimeric partners (DP1 or DP2). The dimerization domain is the E2Fs and DP1 protein interaction interface and is believed to function in protein dimerization. In this study, eight E2F transcription factors (PcE2F1–8) of large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea and one dimerization partner (PcDP1) are identified in the genome of large yellow croakers. The prediction of E2Fs conserved domains revealed that PcE2F1–6 has one DNA-binding domain (DBD) and one dimerization-binding domain (DD), while PcE2F7–8 only possess two duplicate DBDs but not DD, indicating that E2F7–8 cannot form the E2F/DP1 heterodimer. To explore whether PcDP1 is a partner of PcE2F1–6, the ORF of PcE2F1–6 was cloned. Subsequently, its sequence characteristics, the expression pattern in healthy fish, and subcellular co-localization were analyzed, and an interaction between PcDP1 and PcE2F1–6 were detected directly by yeast two-hybrid and BiFC. The PcE2F1, PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6 genes encode a protein of 454, 448, 444, 392, 362, and 396 amino acids, respectively, with accession numbers QFZ93593.1, QFZ93594.1, QFZ93595.1, QFZ93596.1, QFZ93597.1, and QFZ93598.1, respectively. Sequence characteristics analysis found that PcE2F1–5 but not PcE2F6 proteins share the pocket protein-binding domain sequestering in dimerization domains and transactivation domains. The PcE2F1,2,4 proteins possess one nuclear localization signal (NLS), and PcE2F3 protein possess two NLSs, but there is no NLS in PcE2F5 and 6 protein. Moreover, PcE2F4 also contains one NES. However, PcE2F1–6 proteins were all located in nucleus by using Euk-mPloc 2.0 programs and were confirmed by performing the Cherry and EGFP reporter assay. Regarding co-expression of DP1, only E2F4 can transfer DP1’s subcellular location from cytoplasm to the nucleus. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that PcE2F1–6 are constitutively and tissue specifically expressed in all of the tissues tested of a healthy large yellow croaker. The PcE2F1–6, except for PcE2F3, mRNA levels were all detected higher in the liver. PcE2F1–4 were also highly specifically expressed in the kidney, PcE2F4,6 in the brain, and PcE2F5 in the spleen of a healthy large yellow croaker, respectively. Using a yeast two-hybrid system, PcE2F4 interacting with PcDP1 was identified. The interaction between PcE2F4 and PcDP1 was further confirmed by a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay. Collectively, these results indicate that an interaction between PcE2F4 and PcDP1 was detected, which may form heterodimer E2F4/DP1 to regulate cell cycles and immune-related pathways in large yellow croakers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences→Same topicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics→French-language works237,207→