MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neurologic and Psychological Outcomes 2 Years After Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

2025· article· en· W4410955167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caitlin K. Rollins, David Wypij, Laura D. Zambrano, Johanna Calderon, Alex M. Taylor, Jennifer Worhach, S. Fernando Rodriguez, Paul Licht, Moshe Maiman, Nicholas Hart, Mary Beth F. Son, Joe Kossowsky, Matthew L. Friedman, Charlotte V. Hobbs, Michele Kong, Aline B. Maddux, Jennifer L. McGuire, Mary Allen Staat, Lael M. Yonker, Maitreyi Mazumdar, Jane W. Newburger, Adrienne G. Randolph, Angela P. Campbell, Meghan Murdock, Heather Kelly, Candice Colston, Margaret M. Newhams, Tina Pouissaint, Lora Martin, Lacy Malloch, Ashley Stanley-Copeland, Jeanie Craft

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsMedicineGeneralized estimating equationCohortQuality of life (healthcare)PediatricsEjection fractionMedical recordIntensive care unitInternal medicineHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Neurologic and psychological sequelae are observed 1 year after hospitalization for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), but whether these concerns persist is not known. Objective: To examine the trajectory of neurologic, psychological, and quality-of-life sequelae up to 2 years after MIS-C. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study assessed children diagnosed with MIS-C from August 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021, and matched sibling and community controls, when available. The study was conducted 6 to 12 months and 18 to 24 months after discharge from a US or Canadian hospital. Data analysis was performed from May 2024 to January 2025. Exposure: Hospitalization for MIS-C. Main Outcomes and Measures: A central study site remotely administered a structured interview, surveys, neuropsychological assessment, and neurologic examination. Group differences were assessed using generalized estimating equations, accounting for matching. Variables extracted from hospital records included intensive care unit admission and echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: Overall, 95 participants were included in the study; 93 of 108 participants (86%) returned from the year 1 study and 2 participants were added in year 2 (median [IQR] age, 12.6 [11.0-15.7] years; 38 [40%] female and 57 [60%] male). Fifty-nine patients with MIS-C (mean [SD] age, 13.2 [4.0] years; 39 [66%] male) and 36 controls (mean [SD] age, 13.5 [3.5] years; 18 [50%] male) enrolled. In year 2, the MIS-C group was similar to controls on all outcome measures, except they had more somatization symptoms (Behavior Assessment Scale for Children, Third Edition mean [SD] somatization score, 52.1 [13.0] vs 46.5 [8.5]; mean difference, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.3-9.1). Within the MIS-C group, scores generally improved between initial and follow-up evaluations, a finding that was not observed in controls. Eight of 13 children with MIS-C (62%) who had abnormal neurologic examination findings in year 1 had normal examination findings by year 2. Among patients with MIS-C, measures of higher illness severity during hospitalization were associated with worse executive function in year 2 (National Institutes of Health [NIH] List Sort Working Memory Test score, -7.3 points per intensive care unit admission vs not [95% CI, -14.3 to -0.3 points] and -5.8 points per LVEF category change [95% CI, -9.1 to -2.6 points]; verbal fluency switching score, -0.8 points per LVEF category change [95% CI, -1.5 to -0.1 points]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal, matched cohort study of children with MIS-C and controls followed up sequentially up to 2 years after hospital discharge, children with MIS-C had more somatic symptoms than control children. Overall, however, patients with MIS-C had improved neurologic and psychological outcomes between the testing intervals, performing similarly to controls on most measures by year 2 follow-up. These findings suggest that these concerns may improve over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207