Justice pour Baphomet : satanisme, pluralisme religieux et sphère publique aux États-Unis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Temple Satanique, fondé aux États-Unis, fin 2012, est une organisation sataniste, séculariste et religieuse dont l’objectif est d’identifier des collusions entre religion et politiques publiques en adoptant les mêmes stratégies que les fondamentalistes. L’affaire de la statue de Baphomet en Oklahoma, où le Temple a cherché à faire ériger sa propre statue à côté de celle d’un Décalogue, a participé à sa célébrité médiatique. Cet article analyse l’affaire subséquente et similaire qui a eu lieu en Arkansas à partir de 2015. Ce cas permet de comprendre les dynamiques de la doctrine des forums au sein de la sphère publique américaine, l’influence de la Droite chrétienne dans certaines institutions et les stratégies adoptées par le Temple Satanique dans le but de faire respecter un pluralisme religieux à travers une religion « inacceptable ». Cette affaire permet de matérialiser les rapports entre les statuts perçus de majorité et minorité religieuse, et le rôle à double-tranchant de la doctrine des forums.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".