A Versatile Disulfide‐Containing Solid‐Support Strategy for 3′‐Modifiers in Oligonucleotides: Introducing Modular Tandem Oligonucleotide Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemical modifications of oligonucleotides are routinely employed to enhance their functional properties. Amino-modifiers serve as versatile chemical handles for postsynthetic (bio)conjugation, nucleic acid immobilization on solid supports, and investigations into nonenzymatic genome replication relevant to the origins of life, to name a few. Here, we report a cost-effective, disulfide-containing solid-support linkage that enables the on-column synthesis of nucleic acids with 3'-amino or 3'-phosphate modifications. The orthogonality of this solid-support linker facilitates an on-column protecting group strategy, enabling the synthesis of DNA and RNA containing 3'-amino-2',3'-dideoxyribosides from commercial unprotected mononucleosides. Additionally, we present an on-column deprotection protocol for DNA and RNA, prior to cleavage from the solid support, eliminating the precipitation step typically required in conventional RNA workflows, leading to higher recovery for certain strands. Expanding on our previous work, we introduce a versatile modular tandem oligonucleotide synthesis (mTOS) approach, allowing selective release of downstream strands from the one directly bound to the solid-support via the disulfide-containing linker. Together, these advances in solid-support design and oligonucleotide synthesis unlock new opportunities in bioconjugation, biotechnology, and the study of prebiotic replication mechanisms, broadening the utility of chemically modified nucleic acids across research disciplines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".