Cybersecurity Analytics for the Enterprise Environment: A Systematic Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The escalating scale and sophistication of cyber threats compel enterprises to urgently adopt data-driven security analytics. This systematic literature review, adhering to the PRISMA protocol, rigorously synthesizes current knowledge by analyzing 65 peer-reviewed studies (2013–2023) from six major databases on enterprise-level cybersecurity analytics. Our findings reveal a significant industry-wide transition from traditional signature-based tools towards advanced cloud-enabled, big-data and artificial intelligence-powered techniques, where machine learning and graph-based models are increasingly prominent in recent works. While large organizations in finance, Information and Communication Technology, and critical utilities spearhead adoption, dedicated research focusing on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) remains notably limited. Ten thematic observations encapsulate key adoption drivers, an evolving preference for proactive and predictive security strategies, the critical role of heterogeneous log and network data, and persistent implementation challenges-notably data integration, skills shortages, and cost. Furthermore, this review identifies crucial open research avenues, including the development of real-time scalable analytics, unified policy languages, and critically needed SME-oriented solutions. Collectively, these insights provide a robust evidence base to inform future research trajectories and guide the practical deployment of effective cybersecurity analytics in diverse enterprise settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".