MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410967682 · doi:10.9734/air/2025/v26i31357

Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Cutaneous-origin Sepsis: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4410967682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger Antônio Morais Queiroz, Douglas Alves Epaminondas, Elissa Maynardes Coelho Ferreira, Karla Katrinne Honorato Damacena, Mariela Cunha Pires Fiusa, Supercilio Barbosa Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Research · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritically illSepsisMedicineAcute kidney injuryIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the incidence, clinical progression, and therapeutic management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients with sepsis originating from severe dermatologic infections. It emphasizes the clinical significance of cutaneous-origin sepsis, the role of risk factors such as hypotension and inflammatory markers, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrology, dermatology, and infectious disease. Study Design: Systematic literature review. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Place and Duration of Study: Databases searched (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, BVS, MEDLINE) between January 2014 and April 2024. Methodology: The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included if they addressed AKI in the context of dermatologic-origin sepsis. Eligible study designs included observational studies, case series, and clinical reports in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standardized form. Quality assessment used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and JBI checklist, depending on study type. Results: A total of 582 studies were initially identified, with 14 meeting all eligibility criteria. Included studies involved 2,761 adult ICU patients with infections such as deep cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, infected ulcers, and burns. AKI incidence ranged from 21.4% to 64.7%. The presence of AKI was associated with increased need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), longer hospital stays, and higher mortality. Risk factors for poor renal outcomes included sustained hypotension, early vasopressor use, elevated lactate and procalcitonin levels, and persistent oliguria. Common interventions included early antibiotic therapy, volume resuscitation, avoidance of nephrotoxins, and the use of CRRT in unstable patients. Conclusion: Sepsis of dermatologic origin poses a substantial risk for AKI development, with clinical and mortality impacts comparable to other septic sources. Early identification and integrated multidisciplinary management are crucial for improving renal outcomes. Further prospective and multicenter research is needed to refine diagnostic tools and intervention protocols specific to this high-risk population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.432 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in ResearchSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207