MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410970295 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15111400

Optimizing Attenuation Correction in 68Ga-PSMA PET Imaging Using Deep Learning and Artifact-Free Dataset Refinement

2025· article· en· W4410970295 on OpenAlexaff
Masoumeh Dorri Giv, Gülüzar Özbolat, Hossein Arabi, Somayeh Malmir, Shahrokh Naseri, Vahid Roshan Ravan, Hossein Akbari‐Lalimi, Raheleh Tabari Juybari, Ghasem Ali Divband, Nasrin Raeisi, Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki, Emran Askari, Sara Harsini

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsCorrection for attenuationComputer scienceArtifact (error)Artificial intelligenceRobustness (evolution)Deep learningOutlierImage qualityResidualPattern recognition (psychology)Mean squared errorVoxelPositron emission tomographyComputer visionNuclear medicineMathematicsImage (mathematics)AlgorithmMedicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Attenuation correction (AC) is essential for achieving quantitatively accurate PET imaging. In 68Ga-PSMA PET, however, artifacts such as respiratory motion, halo effects, and truncation errors in CT-based AC (CT-AC) images compromise image quality and impair model training for deep learning-based AC. This study proposes a novel artifact-refinement framework that filters out corrupted PET-CT images to create a clean dataset for training an image-domain AC model, eliminating the need for anatomical reference scans. Methods: A residual neural network (ResNet) was trained using paired PET non-AC and PET CT-AC images from a dataset of 828 whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT scans. An initial model was trained using all data and employed to identify artifact-affected samples via voxel-level error metrics. These outliers were excluded, and the refined dataset was used to retrain the model with an L2 loss function. Performance was evaluated using metrics including mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), relative error (RE%), RMSE, and SSIM on both internal and external test datasets. Results: The model trained with the artifact-free dataset demonstrated significantly improved performance: ME = −0.009 ± 0.43 SUV, MAE = 0.09 ± 0.41 SUV, and SSIM = 0.96 ± 0.03. Compared to the model trained on unfiltered data, the purified data model showed enhanced quantitative accuracy and robustness in external validation. Conclusions: The proposed data purification framework significantly enhances the performance of deep learning-based AC for 68Ga-PSMA PET by mitigating artifact-induced errors. This approach facilitates reliable PET imaging in the absence of anatomical references, advancing clinical applicability and image fidelity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207