MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410971582 · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103405

Early detection of cognitive decline with deep learning and graph-based modeling

2025· article· en· W4410971582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMethodsX · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCognitionCognitive networkArtificial intelligenceDeep learningCognitive architectureMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMachine learningSensor fusionReinforcement learningCognitive radioCognitive impairmentPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's world, increasing stress and depression significantly impact cognitive well-being, making early detection of cognitive impairment essential for timely intervention. This work introduces a Multimodal Fusion Cognitive Assessment Framework that leverages advanced deep learning and graph intelligence to enhance early identification accuracy. Traditional tools like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) are limited in adaptability, prompting the need for a more dynamic, data-driven approach. The framework is validated using datasets involving cognitive tests, voice samples, and physiological signals. It enables a scalable, personalized, and adaptive cognitive assessment system that improves early detection and supports targeted intervention strategies. By integrating deep learning and information fusion, this approach addresses the complexity of cognitive health in a modern context.•This paper introduces Multimodal Deep Learning Integration, incorporating MOCA scores, behavioral data, speech signals, and physiological parameters using GAT, TAT, and CNN-LSTM models to capture diverse cognitive indicators.•The proposed model achieves superior performance through Information Fusion via Heterogeneous GNNs, effectively merging cross-domain data to enable holistic cognitive state assessment via inter-modality learning.•This paper applies Reinforcement Learning (RL) to personalize user interactions based on real-time cognitive and stress cues, reducing cognitive overload and enhancing engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethodsXSame topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207