MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410971634 · doi:10.17721/sophia.2024.24.4

THE SPECIFICS OF AUTOCEPHALOUS MOVEMENTS IN UKRAINE AND POLAND IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY: A COMPARATIVE-RELIGIOUS ANALYSIS

2024· article· en· W4410971634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eugenia Netetska, V.V. Zaporozhets

Bibliographic record

VenueSophia Human and Religious Studies Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyPolitical scienceAncient historyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B a c k g r o u n d . The article examines the specifics of autocephalous movements in Ukraine and Poland during the first quarter of the 20th century through a comparative-religious analysis, with particular focus on the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the processes of recognizing church independence. The relevance of the topic is driven by the need to comprehend the historical experience of religious transformations in the post-imperial period, which is crucial for understanding contemporary trends in the development of religious autonomy amidst political instability. M e t h o d s . The authors employ a comparative and interdisciplinary approach, combining historical analysis, sociological research, and religious studies discourse. The results of the study highlight the significance of autocephalous movements as tools for consolidating national identity, overcoming imperial legacies, and shaping new political and religious realities. The conclusions drawn from the research provide valuable insights for modern religious studies, particularly in the context of challenges related to church autonomy. R e s u l t s . The authors emphasize the interconnection between religious autocephaly and national liberation movements. The article analyzes the influence of political, social, and religious factors on the formation of autocephalous churches in the context of struggles for independence. Specifically, the research demonstrates that in Ukraine, the autocephaly of the Orthodox Church was associated with national revival and efforts to overcome the imperial influence of the Russian Orthodox Church. In contrast, in Poland, this process was driven by the state's aim to integrate Orthodox communities into the national system through support for the autocephaly of the Polish Orthodox Autocephalous Church. C o n c l u s i o n s . Special attention is given to the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in recognizing the autocephaly of the Polish Orthodox Church in 1924, underscoring its significance as a key arbiter in matters of church independence. The article also notes that the lack of support from Constantinople for the first formation of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church created obstacles to its international recognition and complicated its establishment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSophia Human and Religious Studies BulletinSame topicRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsFrench-language works237,207