MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410972344 · doi:10.3389/fanim.2025.1573847

Judgment bias, fear, and stress responses of Red Junglefowl and Athens Canadian Random Bred chickens

2025· article· en· W4410972344 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Victor J. Oyeniran, Rosemary H. Whittle, Sara Orlowski, Shawna Weimer

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFight-or-flight responseBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding how poultry perceive and interpret their environment is essential to enhancing their welfare. Animal welfare science relies on measures of the behavioral and physiological components of affective states (positive and negative) as welfare indicators. There has been growing interest in using the judgment bias test (JBT) to study birds’ affective states by assessing their responses to ambiguous cues. The objective of this study was to investigate the affective state of two chicken breeds with different evolutionary histories: the Red Junglefowl (RJF), the primary ancestor of modern chickens, and the Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB), a rustic domesticated breed, using the JBT at two ages. Another objective was to explore the effect of the JBT on the fear and stress responses of the chickens that participated in the JBT compared to those that did not (NJBT) on days (D) 35 and 63. Fear was evaluated using the tonic immobility test, and stress was measured noninvasively from thermal images of the eye and beak. Chickens successfully discriminated between positive (POS) and neutral (NEU) JBT cues, showing shorter latencies to approach the POS cue (P < 0.0001). While there were no breed differences on D29 of the JBT, RJF chickens exhibited shorter latencies to approach cues than ACRB on D60 (P < 0.001). Independent of testing at both ages, RJF had a longer duration of tonic immobility than ACRB (P < 0.01), indicating higher fearfulness. While the JBT did not affect D35 tonic immobility, JBT chickens had longer tonic immobility durations than NJBT on D63 (P < 0.05). Chickens that participated in the JBT had lower eye and beak minimum surface temperatures than NJBT (P < 0.05), indicating that the JBT may have increased stress post-testing. These findings highlight the influence of domestication on the affective states and the importance of considering fear and stress in measuring the affective states of chickens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207