MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410977176 · doi:10.18733/cpi29765

Disrupting Ableism: Education with, by and for Learners with Disability as Equity and Social Justice Education

2025· article· en· W4410977176 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Bathseba Opini, Erica Neeganagwedgin, Ali A. Abdi

Bibliographic record

VenueCultural and Pedagogical Inquiry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbleismSocial justiceEquity (law)Economic JusticeSociologySocial equalityGender studiesPsychologyCriminologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Call for Submissions for the Winter 2026 (Volume 17, No. 2) Special Issue of Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry entitled Disrupting Ableism: Education with, by and for Learners with Disability as Equity and Social Justice Education with Guest Editors Bathseba Opini, Erica Neeganagwedgin and Ali Abdi. This Call for Submissions is Closed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.456
GPT teacher head0.554
Teacher spread0.099 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultural and Pedagogical InquirySame topicDisability Education and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207