MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physiotherapy and physical activity in children with Perthes’ disease

2025· article· en· W4410977365 on OpenAlex
Yasmin D. Hailer, Daniel C. Perry, Emily K. Schaeffer, Jacqueline Li, Kishore Mulpuri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBone & Joint Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAllerganUppsala UniversitetAkademiska SjukhusetCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchIpsenNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAO FoundationCanadian Orthopaedic FoundationBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical activityDiseaseMedicineHydrotherapyAlternative medicineInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: In the absence of clear and consistent clinical guidelines, this study aims to survey the current international consensus on recommendations for physiotherapy (PT), physical activity (PA), and weightbearing in patients with Perthes' disease. Additionally, the study seeks to identify factors influencing these recommendations, and to determine at which stage possible restrictions on physical activity are typically lifted. Methods: An online international cross-sectional survey using a purpose-designed questionnaire with a general section, and three cases of Perthes' disease, was distributed to surgeons through paediatric orthopaedic societies and research groups. Results: A total of 160 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons from 43 different countries (seven continents) participated. There was general agreement that impaired range of motion (ROM) and pain were important when prescribing PT, while the child's sex was not important. There was disagreement on whether age and Waldenström or Lateral Pillar classification were important factors in determining the need for PT. There was widespread agreement that stretching in the early stages of Perthes' disease was important, although Western and Southern Europe and the British Isles differed. There was considerable disagreement about strengthening exercises. 'Weightbearing as tolerated' in the early and fragmentation stages was generally recommended in the British Isles and Scandinavia (both > 90%), whereas other regions showed large variation. Regarding PA, there was broad agreement in allowing swimming and cycling, and discouraging high-impact activities including school sports in all stages. Conclusion: Maintaining ROM was crucial for most participants, with strong consensus to discourage high-impact activities during initial and fragmentation stages. Swimming and cycling were often allowed, but no clear consensus emerged on weightbearing restrictions or when to resume full activities. Consensus within the British Isles, Scandinavia, and Eastern Europe was high for both for PT and PA, but recommendations differed between countries. Recommendations from the British Isles and Scandinavia were less restrictive than their Eastern European counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it