LA PROTECCIÓN INTEGRAL DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS DE LAS PERSONAS MIGRANTES EN SITUACIÓN DE VULNERABILIDAD SOCIAL EN LA FRONTERA SUR DE MÉXICO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo se ofrece un diagnóstico de los factores de riesgo predominantes en la frontera sur de México, que redundan en la violación de los derechos humanos de los migrantes en su travesía hacia Estados Unidos de América o Canadá. El enfoque de la investigación es mixto: se integra por el método jurídico, la sociología jurídica, el derecho comparado y el estudio de casos, con la finalidad de recomendar políticas migratorias que garanticen el respeto de los derechos humanos de las personas migrantes, a la vez de que les otorguen un trayecto y una estancia seguros en nuestro país. This article offers a diagnosis of the predominant risk factors on Mexico's southern border, which result in the violation of migrants' human rights during their journey to the United States or Canada. The research approach is mixed: it integrates the legal method, legal sociology, comparative law, and case studies, with the aim of recommending migration policies that guarantee respect for migrants' human rights while ensuring their safe journey and residence in our country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".