MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410981256 · doi:10.1039/d4na01034e

RNA lipid nanoparticles stabilized during nebulization through excipient selection

2025· article· en· W4410981256 on OpenAlexafffund
Kai V. Slaughter, Daniela Isaacs-Bernal, Eric N. Donders, Sami G. Sabbah, Mickael Dang, Isaac M. Jackiw, Karen Y. T. Chan, Pieter R. Cullis, Molly S. Shoichet

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsExcipientSelection (genetic algorithm)NanoparticleChemistryChromatographyNanotechnologyMaterials scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

therapeutic RNA delivery. However, during the nebulization process, LNPs are subjected to high shear forces that result in particle destabilization and consequent loss of cargo. Here, we provide a generalizable approach to stabilize LNPs by adjusting the nebulization buffer composition. We investigated the effect of buffer composition on nanoparticle size, RNA encapsulation efficiency, and LNP material recovery. We found that pH 5.0 citrate buffer reduces the loss of encapsulated RNA, poloxamer 188 maintains nanoparticle size and improves recovery, and glucose is important for an iso-osmotic solution. RNA encapsulated in nebulized LNPs maintained bioactivity as demonstrated with cellular uptake and functional siRNA delivery to Vero cells expressing nano luciferase. Together, this work shows a versatile strategy for the delivery of inhalable LNP-based RNA therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscale AdvancesSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207