MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410982033 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2025-0077

AAC PT600 pinto dry bean

2025· article· en· W4410982033 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Parthiba Balasubramanian, Syama Chatterton, Ahmed Abdelmagid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAlberta Innovates Bio SolutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAlberta Pulse Growers CommissionAlberta Crop Industry Development Fund
KeywordsPinto beanDry beanHorticultureBiologyAgronomyPhaseolus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AAC PT600 is a high yielding pinto dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar with an upright, indeterminate bush with short vine (Type IIa) growth habit, early maturity, and large seed size. AAC PT600 had significantly improved lodging resistance and partial field resistance (i.e., avoidance) to white mould compared to both Island and AAC Expedition, pinto bean cultivars currently grown in southern Alberta. The base colour of seed coat of AAC PT600 was light brown, similar to AAC Expedition, and was better than Island which had a dark brown base seed coat. The canning and cooking quality attributes of AAC PT600 were similar to the check cultivar Island. AAC PT600 is well suited for commercial production under irrigation in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms→French-language works237,207→