MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410982282 · doi:10.2196/69230

A Novel QR Code–Based Solution for Secure Electronic Health Record Transfer in Venous Thromboembolism Home Rehabilitation Management: Algorithm Development and Validation

2025· article· en· W4410982282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Changzhen Li, Zhigeng Jin, Zheqi Zhang, B.X. Liu, Yutao Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintAlgorithmComputer scienceCode (set theory)MedicineWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common vascular disorder requiring extended anticoagulation therapy postdischarge to reduce recurrence risk. Home rehabilitation management systems that use electronic health records from hospital care provide opportunities for continuous patient monitoring. However, transferring medical data from clinical to home settings raises significant concerns about privacy and security. Conventional methods such as manual data entry, optical character recognition, and dedicated data transmission lines face notable technical and operational challenges. Objective: This study aims to develop a QR code-based security transmission algorithm using Avro and byte pair encoding (BPE). The algorithm supports the secure creation and transfer of out-of-hospital health records by enabling patients to scan QR codes via a dedicated mobile app, ensuring data security and user privacy. Methods: Between January and October 2024, 300 hospitalized patients with VTE were recruited at the Sixth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Post discharge, participants used a home rehabilitation app tailored for VTE management. The QR code-based security transmission algorithm was developed to securely transfer in-hospital electronic health records to the out-of-hospital app. It uses BPE, Avro, and Gzip for optimized data compression and uses ChaCha20 and BLAKE3 for encryption and authentication. Specifically, BPE tokenizes medical text, while Avro serializes JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) objects, contributing to data encryption. A proprietary tokenizer was trained, and compression efficiency was evaluated using a "Performance Benchmark Dataset." Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the compression efficiency of JSON serialization methods (Avro and ASN.1 [Abstract Syntax Notation One]), and tokenization algorithms (BPE and unigram). Results: The dataset consisted of JSON files from 300 patients, averaging 240.1 fields per file (range 89-623) and 7095 bytes in size (range 2748-17,425 bytes). Using the BPE + Avro + Gzip algorithm, the average file size was reduced to 1048 bytes, achieving a compression ratio of 6.67. This was 1.82 times more efficient than traditional Gzip compression (average file size: 1907 bytes; compression ratio: 3.66; P<.001). For Chinese medical text tokenization, BPE outperformed unigram with a compression ratio of 4.68 versus 4.55 (P<.001). Avro and ASN.1 demonstrated comparable compression ratios of 2.57 and 2.59, respectively, when used alone (P=.30). However, Avro combined with BPE and Gzip significantly outperformed ASN.1, achieving compression ratios of 6.67 versus 5.21 (P<.001). Additionally, 84.7% (254/300) of patients needed to scan only 1 QR code, requiring an average of 3.1 seconds. Conclusions: The QR code-based security transmission algorithm using Avro and BPE efficiently compresses and transmits data in an encrypted manner and authenticates the identity of the scanning users, ensuring the privacy and security of medical data. Delivered as a software development kit, the algorithm offers straightforward implementation and usability, supporting its broad adoption across various applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive TechnologiesSame topicQR Code Applications and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207