MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410983616 · doi:10.32942/x22k9h

Vaccination and immigration rates influence raccoon rabies elimination and recolonization in simulated urban-suburban landscapes

2025· preprint· en· W4410983616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily M Beasley, Timothée Poisot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsRabiesImmigrationVaccinationGeographySocioeconomicsVirologyBiologyArchaeologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The raccoon variant of the rabies virus (RRV) is managed in the eastern United States and Canada via distribution of oral rabies vaccine (ORV) baits. The goal of ORV distribution is to reach seroprevalence rates (an index of population immunity) of at least 60%, the threshold thought to eliminate RRV. Seroprevalence rates in urban areas rarely reach target levels, predictably leading to rabies outbreaks. However, many urban areas have spent several years rabies-free, aligning with previous work suggesting RRV can be eliminated from urban areas at below-target seroprevalence rates. Using an agent-based model to simulate raccoon populations in urban landscapes, we examined 1) whether RRV can be eliminated at vaccination thresholds below 60% and 2) whether landscapes with below-target vaccination rates are vulnerable to RRV recolonization, and 3) whether the rate and timing of immigration influences elimination and recolonization. Vaccination and immigration rates influenced elimination probability: elimination was more likely and occurred more quickly in landscapes with higher vaccination rates and less likely in landscapes with higher immigration rates. All immigration variables (immigration rate, immigrant disease prevalence, and immigration timing) influenced the probability of recolonization after rabies was eliminated: recolonization was more likely in landscapes with high immigration rates and when immigrants had higher disease prevalence, but less likely when immigration occurred seasonally rather than continuously. Vaccination did not have a clear effect on recolonization probability but reduced the number of rabies cases during a recolonization event. Although elimination was highly likely in our simulated landscapes due to their small spatial extent, our results suggest that vaccination rates of at least 50% result in timely rabies elimination (median 1.5 years). After elimination is achieved, strategies for preventing infected individuals from entering the rabies-free area are essential for preventing recolonization events, as vaccination rates had a much smaller effect on recolonization that immigration rates and timing. Understanding long-distance movements of host individuals is crucial for managing diseases such as rabies which likely persist at the regional scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207