MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Under the Influence of His Leader Cult: Miklós Horthy’s Self-Image During World War II

2025· article· en· W4410983645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dávid Turbucz

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBalkans: History, Politics, Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultImage (mathematics)World War IIPsychologyHistoryAncient historyPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After World War I and the collapse of the Hungarian Kingdom via the Trianon Peace Treaty, a leader cult developed around Miklós Horthy, regent (the head of state) of Hungary between 1920 and 1944. This cult existed throughout the so-called Horthy era, but its intensity and emphasis changed. According to the official image of Horthy, created by many cult-makers and disseminated through different propaganda techniques, he was the only one capable of restoring the national glory and greatness that Hungary had lost after the Great War. As in the cases of other European leader cults of that time, it is very important to analyze the impact of the Horthy cult on the man who was the object of such adulation. This issue has not received sufficient scholarly attention from historians. This article shows how the uninterrupted propaganda, and his oversimplified and exaggerated official image, had a significant impact on Horthy’s self-image during World War II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicBalkans: History, Politics, SocietyFrench-language works237,207