MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Rescue Army in Szentgotthárd: The Daily Life of French Soldiers in War Diaries and Memoirs

2025· article· en· W4410983669 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Özkan Bardakçı

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirHistoryAncient historyPsychologyAeronauticsEngineeringArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article examines the day-to-day service of French soldiers and captains at the Battle of Szentgotthárd (Saint Gotthard) between the Holy Roman Empire and the Sublime Porte in 1664. The soldiers are obscure figures in history, but they appear in correspondence, memoirs, and other personal papers belonging to captains of the first or second rank. This documentation, dispersed across archives, makes it possible to follow the captains and men of the troops. The sources, written on a day-to-day basis or after the battle, allow us to explore the many dimensions of the fighting experience. The testimonies confirm several key aspects of warfare: fear, hunger, the role of camaraderie and religion, tensions within the imperial armies, and the “war culture” of these soldiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207