MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410984532 · doi:10.37128/2411-4413-2024-4-1

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A CATALYST FOR EFFICIENCY IN AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

2024· article· en· W4410984532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roman Lohosha, Svitlana Lutkovska, Tetiana KOLESNYK, Vitaliy SHUBERANSKYI

Bibliographic record

VenueEСONOMY FINANСES MANAGEMENT Topical issues of science and practical activity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)AgricultureBusinessMarketing managementKnowledge managementMarketingProcess managementComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the potential of using artificial intelligence (hereafter – AI) as a tool for increasing efficiency in agricultural management and marketing. The emphasis is placed on the need to critically examine the opportunities and challenges of integrating AI into the agricultural business. The factors that influence the success of implementation, including investments in technological infrastructure, staff training, process adaptation, as well as financial and organizational constraints faced by agricultural enterprises in the current conditions of global transformations, are investigated. The author analyzes current achievements and prospects of using AI to improve the accuracy of demand forecasting, optimize supply chains, automate business processes, and improve marketing strategies. Particular attention is paid to the role of AI in the context of Ukraine’s European integration, which opens up access to innovative technologies, investments, and European markets. The author analyzes the main aspects of the impact of European integration processes on the development of Ukraine’s agricultural sector, including standardization, financial support, staff development, and infrastructure modernization. It was substantiated that AI has significant potential to optimize resource management, increase the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises and ensure the sustainable development of the industry. Recommendations for the effective implementation of AI in the agricultural sector are presented, taking into account the challenges and opportunities created by modern technologies. The author analyzes successful cases of AI use in the agricultural sector and its role in increasing the productivity, efficiency and sustainability of agricultural production. International experience is analyzed, in particular in the United States, Israel, Canada, and the Netherlands, where AI helps to predict yields, optimize resources, and develop sustainable technologies in agriculture. The importance of European integration for the development of the domestic agricultural sector through the introduction of modern standards, innovations and financing is emphasized. The results of the study can be used to develop the marketing strategies for the introduction of AI in the field of agricultural management, which will ensure the sustainable development of the industry and increase its competitiveness in international markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEСONOMY FINANСES MANAGEMENT Topical issues of science and practical activitySame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207