MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410985938 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3576225

Investigation of the Robustness of XAI-Based Federated Learning Against Adversarial Attacks for Smart Grid False Data Detection

2025· article· en· W4410985938 on OpenAlexaff
Islam Elgarhy, Mahmoud M. Badr, Mohamed Mahmoud, Jianbing Ni, Maazen Alsabaan, Tariq Alshawi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Adversarial systemGridData miningSmart gridComputer securityArtificial intelligenceData modelingDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training of machine learning (ML) models, making it a valuable approach for detecting false data in smart power grids (SGs) to enhance grid stability while protecting consumers privacy. However, FL-based ML models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks during both training and inference phases, which can compromise data security. To address these vulnerabilities, we first investigate the robustness of a novel FL-based false data detection approach using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), referred to as XAI-based FL detection. This approach utilizes explanations of consumers power consumption data, rather than raw data, during the training process. We assess the robustness of the XAI-based FL detection compared to traditional data-driven FL detection against two types of adversarial attacks: Gradient Inversion attacks in the training phase, where adversaries reconstruct private data from shared gradients, and Evasion attacks in the inference phase, where adversaries subtly modify input data to deceive the detection model. Then, we propose a secure XAI-based FL detector with adversarial training to defend against both attack types. The key idea is that XAI helps mask model gradients during training because XAI-generated explanations remain nearly identical across different samples. Therefore, attackers struggle to accurately reconstruct the original training data, even if they obtain precise explanations using gradient inversion attacks. Additionally, XAI effectively distinguishes between benign and malicious samples. When combined with adversarial training, XAI strengthens model robustness against evasion attacks without compromising accuracy, effectively resolving the trade-off between security and performance. Our proposed detector reduced the success rate of evasion attacks from 94.99% to 29.11 explanations, and further to 0% with adding adversarial training. It also increased the mean square error for gradient inversion attacks from 0.01 to 2.60 in the most severe attack scenarios, making such attacks ineffective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningFrench-language works237,207