MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410990080 · doi:10.71403/fjvx9416

Mot éditorial

2021· article· fr· W4410990080 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Marchand, Claudia Corriveau, Vincent Martin, Izabella Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de didactique des mathématiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le comité éditorial a le plaisir de vous proposer quatre articles ainsi qu’une nouvelle rubrique pour ce troisième numéro. La nouvelle rubrique intitulée « Mémoire collective » résulte d’une envie du comité de mettre en lumière des textes issus des conférences plénières qui ont eu lieu dans le cadre des rencontres annuelles du Groupe de didactique des mathématiques (GDM) depuis son origine. La RQDM est une revue qui est née d’une volonté de notre communauté afin de diffuser les travaux de celle-ci et il s’agit ici d’une autre manière de diffuser nos travaux et ceux qui nous ont précédés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de didactique des mathématiquesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207