Phased Antenna-Array Synthesis Using Taylor-Series Expansion and Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to synthesizing phased antenna arrays (PAAs) by combining Taylor-series expansion with neural networks (NNs), enhancing the PAA synthesis process for modern communication and radar systems. Synthesizing PAAs is crucial for these systems, offering versatile beamforming capabilities. Traditional methods often rely on complex analytical formulations or numerical optimizations, leading to suboptimal solutions or high computational costs. The proposed method uses Taylor-series expansion to derive analytical expressions for PAA radiation patterns and beamforming characteristics, simplifying the optimization process. Additionally, neural networks are employed to model the intricate relationships between PAA parameters and desired performance metrics, providing adaptive learning and real-time adjustments. A validation of the proposed method is performed on a dual-band 5G antenna, which exhibits marked resonances at 28.14 GHz and 37.88 GHz, with reflection coefficients of S11 = −19 dB and S11 = −19.33 dB, respectively. The integration of Taylor expansion with NNs offers improved efficiency, reduced computational complexity, and the ability to explore a broader design space. Simulation results and case studies demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the approach in practical scenarios. This work represents a significant advancement in PAA synthesis, showcasing the synergistic integration of mathematical modeling and artificial intelligence for optimized antenna design in modern communication and radar systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it