Nadine Magloire. Romancière séditieuse mal-aimée de la critique littéraire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse comment, avec Le sexe mythique (1975), Nadine Magloire aurait contrevenu aux conventions de la bienséance en abordant les sujets épineux de la sexualité et de l’érotisme. Au moyen d’une écriture séditieuse, d’une plume contestataire et d’un style percutant, l’auteure met en scène une héroïne célibataire qui entretient des relations sentimentales avec deux hommes différents et discute ouvertement de la « performance » de ses amants, ainsi que de leurs lacunes sexuelles. Si quelques critiques littéraires considèrent que ce roman illustre adéquatement la condition féminine en Haïti, d’autres, au contraire, estiment qu’il devrait plutôt être taxé de pamphlet inutile et provocateur. En allant résolument à l’encontre des commentaires de la critique, du public et de ses détracteurs, Nadine Magloire a-t-elle anéanti sa propre carrière littéraire ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".