MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411001098 · doi:10.37275/scipsy.v6i2.190

Preventing Cognitive Decline in Late-Life Depression: A Longitudinal Study on the Efficacy of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Older Adults in Palembang, Indonesia

2025· article· en· W4411001098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Psychiatrica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)OmegaLate life depressionGerontologyCognitive declineOmega 3 fatty acidLongitudinal studyCognitionPsychologyFatty acidMedicineClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineBiologyDocosahexaenoic acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidBiochemistryDementiaPhysicsDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Late-life depression (LLD) is a prevalent condition in older adults and a significant risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. In Indonesia, with its aging population and specific dietary patterns, understanding interventions for LLD-associated cognitive impairment is crucial. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) offer potential neuroprotective benefits. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of long-term omega-3 PUFA supplementation in mitigating cognitive decline among older adults with LLD in Palembang, Indonesia. Methods: This 24-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Palembang. Three hundred sixty older adults (aged ≥60 years) with a current DSM-5 diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and subjective cognitive complaints were randomized (1:1) to receive either daily oral supplementation of 2.2 grams of omega-3 PUFAs (containing 1320 mg eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 880 mg docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) or a matched placebo (corn oil). The primary outcome was the change in the Indonesian version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog-INA) score over 24 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Indonesian version (MoCA-INA), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). Results: Over 24 months, the omega-3 group exhibited significantly less decline on the ADAS-Cog-INA compared to the placebo group (mean difference: -2.1 points; 95% CI: -3.8 to -0.4; p=0.018). Statistically significant benefits for the omega-3 group were also observed in MoCA-INA scores (mean difference: 1.5 points; p=0.025) and GDS-30 scores (mean difference: -2.5 points; p=0.011). BDNF levels increased significantly in the omega-3 group relative to placebo (p=0.008), while hs-CRP levels showed a non-significant trend towards reduction (p=0.072). Conclusion: Long-term supplementation with 2.2 g/day of EPA-rich omega-3 PUFAs resulted in a modest but statistically significant attenuation of cognitive decline and improvement in depressive symptoms in older adults with LLD in Palembang. These findings suggest that omega-3 PUFAs could be a valuable adjunctive therapeutic strategy in this specific Southeast Asian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it