Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage de 504 pages (incluant les rfrences bibliographiques), crit par une quipe de scientifiques canadiens (Qubec) et produit par les ditions Berger (www.editionsberger.com),prsente une vision classique de la Protection intgre des cultures (PIC) avec un dcoupage en 8 chapitres prsentant l'ensemble des stratgies de lutte intgre contre les ennemis des cultures (maladies, insectes, nmatodes et mauvaises herbes), bien quilibr, complet et abondamment illustr.Il s'agit avant tout d'un ouvrage pratique, ouvert et didactique, accessible au grand public, avec de nombreuses rfrences scientifiques sur lesquelles il s'appuie.Fait important, ce manuel a t couronn d'un prix Roberval dans la catgorie Enseignement suprieur (2024), organis chaque anne par l'Universit de technologie de Compigne (UTC), France.Notons enfin que les ditions Berger (Qubec, Canada) produisent des livres scientifiques et techniques ainsi que des essais de vulgarisation scientifique dans de nombreux domaines dont l'environnement, la sant et l'agriculture.Les auteurs : Jose Fortin est agronome, professeurechercheuse titulaire au Dpartement des sols
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".