An Integrated Model of Life Skills Coaching Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (LSC-TPB Model)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many studies emphasize the importance of life skills coaching, but the specific mechanisms involved are not sufficiently explained. To advance life skills literature and provide insights for practitioners, it is necessary to explain the beliefs and intentions that underpin how coaches teach life skills. As part of efforts to develop a framework that reflects these factors, this study proposes an integrated model combining the theory of planned behavior (TPB) with existing life skills coaching (LSC) theories. The LSC-TPB model explains specific life skills coaching processes by focusing on three core beliefs (i.e. attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavior control), intentions, and implementation of coaches. This model provides explanations for why coaches may fail to teach life skills despite their intentions. Finally, practical implications for how this model can be applied in sport settings, as well as potential areas for future research, are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it