Revisiting nephrin signaling and its specialized effects on the uniquely adaptable podocyte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nephrin is a transmembrane Ig-like domain-containing protein that serves as a central structural and signaling scaffold in kidney filtration. First identified in 1998 as mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome, the recent identification of nephrin autoantibodies in acquired kidney diseases has sparked renewed interest in nephrin biology. In specialized cells known as podocytes, nephrin helps establish and maintain the slit diaphragm (SD), a unique cell-cell junction formed between interdigitating cell projections known as foot processes (FPs). Together, the SD and FP are among the first stages of renal filtration, where they are subject to numerous biochemical and mechanical stressors. Although podocytes are highly adapted to this environment, over time and with injury, this elevated strain can lead to pathological structural changes, detachment, and proteinuria. As such, the complex set of signaling mechanisms provided by nephrin are essential for controlling podocyte adaptability. Herein, we provide a thorough and up-to-date review on nephrin signaling, including a focus on cross-talk between nephrin interactors and signaling regions across podocytes. We first highlight new findings regarding podocyte structure and function, followed by an emphasis on why nephrin is among the most critical proteins for maintaining these features. We then detail a comprehensive list of known nephrin interactors and describe several of their effects, including calcium regulation, cell survival, cell polarity, phase separation-mediated actin reorganization, and SD-focal adhesion dynamics. Collectively, our emerging understanding of the broader cellular context of nephrin signaling provides important insight for clinical strategies to mitigate podocyte injury and kidney disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".