MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411011480 · doi:10.2196/71619

Population-Level Dissemination of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App: Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Values-Based Messages in Social Media Advertisements

2025· article· en· W4411011480 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonathan B. Bricker, Margarita Santiago‐Torres, Kristin E. Mull, Brianna M. Sullivan, Ravi Mehrotra

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintSocial mediaSmartphone applicationmHealthSmartphone appAdvertisingPopulationInternet privacyPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineMultimediaEnvironmental healthWorld Wide WebPsychological interventionBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cigarette smoking is prevalent in many countries worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), presenting an urgent public health challenge. Disseminating freely available smoking cessation treatments that effectively decrease cigarette smoking globally is urgently needed. Objective: Identify the highest impact and most cost-effective values-based social media advertisements to disseminate our smoking cessation smartphone app, "iCanQuit", among adults living in 7 major cities of India. Values represented in the advertisements included family, relationships, self-care, health, and self-control. Using a quasi-experimental design, we aimed to determine (1) which values-based advertisements had the highest smoking cessation app dissemination reach, as measured by click-through rate (CTR), app installs, and app usage metrics; and (2) which values-based message advertisements were more cost-effective as measured by cost-per-impression, cost-per-click, and cost-per-install. The study population included a selected media market of individuals living in 7 metro cities of India - Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune - who were exposed to one of 6 social media advertisements from January 16 to May 5, 2024. Methods: The advertisement campaign design for each of the identified values, based on previous smoking cessation trial data, followed a collaborative iterative process. Advertisements ran sequentially for 16 weeks. Advertisement exposure and app usage data were objectively collected via Google's Display & Video 360 advertisements campaign management and Firebase app development platforms. Advertisement exposure impact on app engagement was measured via several metrics, including click-through rate (CTR, ie, the likelihood of user clicks on an advertisement after seeing it), the number of app installs (ie, a user opening the app for the first time after downloading it), and the number of app sessions (ie, app usage). Cost efficiency was measured via cost per click and cost per install for each ad. Results: Overall, the CTR was 5%. The app was installed 5111 times. The average cost per click and cost per app install across all advertisements were US $ 0.006 and US $ 6.43, respectively. The advertisements with the lowest cost per install (range: US $4.83-US $5.16) and highest CTR (between 6% and 9%) focused on the values of family, health, and self-control. Advertisements focused on the values of relationships and self-care had modestly higher levels of engagement. Conclusions: Advertisements focusing on the values of family, health, and self-control had the highest potential reach at the lowest cost. Overall, these findings provide insights into the reach and cost-effectiveness of values-based messages in social media advertisements, guiding future outreach efforts for population-level dissemination of smoking cessation apps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→