MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411012326 · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109486

Application of the hierarchical Bayesian models to analyze semi-autogenous mill throughput

2025· article· en· W4411012326 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhanbolat Magzumov, Mustafa Kumral

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThroughputMillBayesian probabilityComputer scienceBayesian inferenceProcess engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The aim is to provide a robust statistical framework for improving process control strategies in SAG milling operations. • Bayesian Hierarchical Models capture the causalities between geological and operational variables for SAG mill throughput. • The hierarchical framework accounts for nested data structures, enabling partial pooling of information across campaigns. • This research also detects causal inference in SAG mill performance. Optimizing throughput in semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mills is a critical challenge in mining and mineral processing, directly influencing energy efficiency and operational costs. While mill speed, power, dimensions, ball charge, and feed rate can be controlled, uncertainties in ore hardness, particle size distribution, and liner wear create significant variability in performance. These challenges necessitate a modeling approach that not only captures operational dependencies but also accounts for hierarchical data structures and uncertainty. This study employs a Bayesian Hierarchical Model (BHM) to quantify the relationships between geological, blasting, and mill operational factors, providing a structured probabilistic framework for throughput prediction and decision-making. A systematic variable selection process using Bayesian inference identifies ore hardness, SAG mill rotation speed (RPM), and the tonnage of crushed material as the most influential predictors. The model also accounts for liner wear across multiple operational liner age periods, capturing its cumulative effect on power consumption and grinding efficiency. Unlike conventional statistical techniques, which assume fixed variable relationships, the Bayesian approach allows partial pooling across operational contexts, improving predictive accuracy and adaptability. The findings highlight the advantages of Bayesian methods over traditional regression techniques through uncertainty quantification and hierarchical structure. Integrating domain knowledge with probabilistic modeling enhances SAG mill prediction, enabling data-driven decision-making in complex mining environments. The results provide a foundation for improving energy efficiency, reducing operational variability, and refining throughput predictions under diverse geological and equipment conditions. This study advances statistical methodologies in mining process optimization, demonstrating the practical benefits of Bayesian modeling in industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinerals EngineeringSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207