Bioeconomy in horticulture for profit optimisation and improved livelihood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of bioeconomy principles into horticulture presents a transformative opportunity to reorient the sector toward sustainability, profitability, and inclusiveness. By harnessing renewable biological resources, circular production systems, and cutting-edge innovations, horticulture can evolve beyond conventional, input-intensive models into regenerative and climate-resilient enterprises. This paper examines the strategic pillars of a horticultural bioeconomy, including sustainable resource management, circular economy approaches, renewable energy adoption, product diversification, and technology-led innovation, and demonstrates how these elements converge to redefine the future of horticulture. Drawing on field-level evidence and practical applications, the study highlights successful case studies such as coconut-based integrated farming systems and banana cultivation in India, illustrating how bioeconomy-aligned models can improve farm incomes, enhance ecological balance, and strengthen rural livelihoods. The paper concludes with insights on scaling these interventions through supportive policies, capacity-building, and institutional convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".