MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411016411 · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2025.05.003

Toxoplasma gondii: a parasite pollutant in the Arctic

2025· review· en· W4411016411 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Jenkins, Émilie Bouchard, Adrián Hernández‐Ortiz

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Parasitology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaFisheries Joint Management CommitteeDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesPolar Knowledge CanadaArcticNetGovernment of NunavutMakivikWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of SaskatchewanChurchill Northern Studies CentreSociété Française de lutte contre les Cancers et les leucémies de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent
KeywordsToxoplasma gondiiArcticWildlifeThe arcticParasite hostingBiologyArctic foxEcologyGeographyClimate changeOceanographyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTrends in ParasitologySame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207