MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411017857 · doi:10.1186/s13071-025-06857-1

Molecular characterization of tick-borne bacterial and protozoan pathogens in parasitic ticks from Xinjiang, China

2025· article· en· W4411017857 on OpenAlexaff
Bingjie Wang, Zhiqiang Liu, Shiying Zhu, Jinchao Zhang, Wei Qi, Jianyu Wang, Dongfang Li, Lan He, Junlong Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueParasites & Vectors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsBiologyAnaplasmaTickAnaplasma phagocytophilumRickettsiaGenetic diversityTick-borne diseaseBartonellaPopulationAnaplasmataceaeMicrobiologyVirologyGeneticsVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ticks are a type of hematophagous parasite, serving as critical vectors of pathogens that cause numerous human and animal diseases. Climate change has driven the geographical expansion of tick populations and increased the global transmission risk of tick-borne diseases. However, there has been a lack of comprehensive data on tick species distribution and their associated pathogen profiles in Xinjiang, China. METHODS: Ticks were collected from 19 sampling sites across nine regions in Xinjiang. The species were identified using both morphological and molecular biological methods. The presence of tick-borne bacterial and protozoan pathogens was detected through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Finally, sequencing and phylogenetic analyses were performed to further characterize the identified ticks and pathogens. RESULTS: A total of 1093 ticks were collected and identified, representing four genera and nine species, with Hyalomma asiaticum being the dominant species. Haplotype diversity and genetic differentiation analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene of the dominant species demonstrated that the Hy. asiaticum population in Xinjiang exhibits high haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.734), low nucleotide diversity (π = 0.00403), and significant genetic differentiation (Fst = 0.19716). Pathogen detection using PCR revealed an infection rate of 9.3% for Anaplasma, 18.1% for Rickettsia, and 9.0% for piroplasms. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequences indicated that the Anaplasma genus identified in ticks comprised Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Phylogenetic analysis based on the opmA gene showed that the Rickettsia genus identified in ticks included Rickettsia aeschlimannii, Rickettsia conorii, Rickettsia slovaca, Rickettsia conorii subsp. raoultii, Rickettsia sp., Candidatus Rickettsia barbariae, and Candidatus Rickettsia jingxinensis. Similarly, phylogenetic analysis based on the 18S rRNA gene demonstrated that the piroplasms identified in ticks included Theileria annulata, Theileria ovis, Babesia bigemina, Babesia occultans, and Babesia sp. All gene sequences of the detected pathogens showed 99.8-100% identity with corresponding sequences deposited in GenBank. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Xinjiang harbors a rich diversity of tick species with a wide geographical distribution. Furthermore, the tick-borne pathogens in this region are complex and diverse. These results underscore the necessity of sustained and enhanced surveillance efforts targeting ticks and tick-borne diseases in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParasites & VectorsSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207