MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411019884 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2025.3571637

A Bi-Directional Neural Interface Chip With 32-Channel 83-dB DR CTDSM-Based Recording Using FIRDAC With Pre-Emptive ELD Compensation

2025· article· en· W4411019884 on OpenAlexaff
Xiongfei Jiang, Yuntao Han, Grahame Reynolds, Zhaoguang Si, Alfredo Gonzalez‐Sulser, Themis Prodromakis, Shiwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersRoyal Society
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)Interface (matter)Channel (broadcasting)ChipComputer scienceBrain–computer interfaceComputer hardwareElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringNeurosciencePsychologyElectroencephalographyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical-ready neuromodulation devices for real-time monitoring and treatment of neurological disorders require a neural interface integrated circuit (IC) that supports therapeutic neurostimulation together with concurrent recording of neural activities from large brain regions. To address this need, this article presents an IC with 32 high dynamic range (HDR) electrocorticography (ECoG) recording channels and two programmable neurostimulators allowing bi-directional neural interfacing. The recording channel uses a 2nd-order continuous-time$\Delta \Sigma $modulator (CTDSM) architecture with 12-tap finite impulse response digital-to-analog converter (FIRDAC) feedback facilitated by a pre-emptive current-steering excess loop delay (ELD) compensation scheme. By employing a high-performance linearized low-noise/low-power transconductance amplifier (L3TA) in the input integration stage, the recording channel achieves 83-dB dynamic range (DR) with up to 222-mVpplinear input range, and thus can accommodate large electrode dc offsets (EDOs) and stimulation artifacts. Thanks to the FIRDAC that relaxes component matching requirements, each recording channel occupies only 0.028 mm2and consumes$5.39~{\mu }$W while being manufactured in standard 180-nm CMOS technology. The concurrent neural recording and stimulation capabilities of the chip have been validated in a mouse experiment in vivo, which shows that the recording channel can tolerate real stimulation artifacts and the recorded ECoG signals can be separated from the artifacts with high fidelity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207