MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411022184 · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf007

Tailor’s drawer no more: a reappraisal of the spider family Dictynidae O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 <i>sensu lato</i>

2025· article· en· W4411022184 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine O. Montana, Franklyn Cala-Riquelme, Sarah C. Crews, Jacob A. Gorneau, Amin M. al‐Jamal, Luigie D Alequín, Joseph C. Spagna, Francesco Ballarin, Lauren A. Esposito

Bibliographic record

VenueZoological Journal of the Linnean Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSensuBiologySpiderSensu strictoZoologyEvolutionary biologyGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mesh-web weaver family Dictynidae s.l. has been labelled a ‘tailor’s drawer’ family because it contains taxonomically unorganized and often evolutionarily distant species. Previous molecular phylogenetic studies using limited taxonomic sampling and legacy target genes involving representatives of the family have been consistent in: (i) exhibiting low branch support values and (ii) the recovery of genera and species currently classified as dictynids outside of Dictynidae. The genera within the family and the relationships among dictynid genera have never been rigorously tested using genomic-scale data. Here, we use exemplar dictynid species from the most currently recognized dictynid genera and ultraconserved elements (UCEs) recovered in silico from low-coverage, whole-genome sequencing plus Sanger data to resolve the phylogenetic placement and relationships of genera within the family Dictynidae s.l. The resulting phylogeny, along with morphological evidence, supports several taxonomic updates to the group: Argyronetidae stat. reinst., Lathyidae fam. n., and Dictynidae s.s. are included in Dictynoidea. Argyronetidae stat. reinst. include the genera Altella, Arctella, Argenna, Argyroneta, Chaerea, Devade, Hackmania, Iviella, Mizaga, Paratheuma, Saltonia, Tricholathys. The family Lathyidae fam. n. is proposed to include the genera Afrolathys gen. n. (Af. madagascariensis sp. n. and Af. tanzanica sp. n.), Analtella stat. reinst. (Analtella affinis comb. n., Analtella dentichelis comb. n., Analtella narbonensis comb. n., Analtella pygmaea comb. n., and Analtella teideensis comb. n.), Andronova gen. n. (Andronova alberta comb. n., Andronova annulata comb. n., Andronova. arabs comb. n., Andronova cambridgei comb. n., Andronova dihamata comb. n., Andronova lehtineni comb. n., Andronova maculosa comb. n., Andronova spasskyi comb. n., Andronova subalberta comb. n., Andronova subviridis comb. n., and Andronova sylvania comb. n.), Asialathys gen. n. (As. deltoidea comb. n., As. fibulata comb. n., As. huangyangjieensis comb. n., As. spiralis comb. n., and As. zhanfengi comb. n.), Bannaella (B. lhasana, B. sexoculata comb. n., B. sinuata, and B. tibialis), Denticulathys gen. n. (D. amaataaidoo sp. n.), Langlibaitiao (Langlibaitiao chishuiensis, Langlibaitiao inaffectus, Langlibaitiao insulanus comb. n., and Langlibaitiao zhangshun), Lathys s.s. (Lathys bin, Lathys borealis, Lathysbrevitibialis, Lathyscoralynae, Lathysdixiana, Lathysfoxi, Lathysheterophthalma, Lathyshumilis, Lathyshumilis meridionalis, Lathyslepida, Lathysmantarota, Lathys sexpustulata, Lathys spiralis, and Lathys subhumilis), Scotolathys s.s. (S. delicatula stat. reinst., S. immaculata stat. reinst., S. maculina stat. reinst., S. pallida stat. reinst., and S. simplex), Tolokonniella gen. n. Tolokonniella ankaraensis comb. n., Tolokonniella mallorcensis comb. n., Tolokonniella maura comb. n., Tolokonniella stigmatisata comb. n., and Tolokonniella truncata comb. n.). Finally, Dictynidae s.s. are strongly supported to include the genera Adenodictyna, Ajmonia (Aj. changtunesis comb. n.) Anaxibia, Arangina, Archaeodictyna (Archaeodictyna aguasverdes comb. n., Archaeodictyna bispinosa comb. n., Archaeodictyna fuerteventurensis comb. n., and Archaeodictyna lanzarotensis comb. n.), Arethyna gen. n. (Arethyna coloradensis comb. n., Arethynaidahoana comb. n., Arethyna osceola comb. n., Arethyna personata comb. n., Arethyna peon comb. n., Arethyna saltona comb. n., Arethyna secuta comb. n., Arethyna sierra comb. n., Arethyna ubsunurica comb. n., Arethyna volucripes comb. n., and Arethyna volucripes volucripoides comb. n.), Argennina, Atelolathys, Banaidja, Brigittea (B. colona comb. n.), Califorenigma gen. n. (C. linsdalei comb. n.), Callevophthalmus, Dictyna (D. abundans, D. alaskae, D. albicoma, D. albovittata, D. alyceae, D. apacheca, D. arundinacea, D. bostoniensis, D. brevitarsus, D. cafayate, D. chandrai, D. cofete, D. columbiana, D. cronebergi, D. crosbyi, D. dauna, D. ectrapela, D. fluminensis, D. guineensis, D. hamifera, D. kosiorowiczi, D. laeviceps, D. linzhiensis, D. livida, D. marilina, D. moctezuma, D. namulinensis, D. navajoa, D. pictella, D. procerula, D. pusilla, D. quadrispinosa, D. ranchograndei, D. saepei, D. similis, D. simoni, D. sinaloa, D. siniloanensis, D. tarda, D. togata, D. tristis, D. trivirgata, D. tullgreni, D. turbida, D. uncinata, D. uvs, D. vittata, D. vultuosa, and D. yongshun), Dictynomorpha, Emblyna (E. acoreensis, E. aiko, E. altamira, E. ampla, E. angulata, E. annulipes, E. ardea, E. artemisia, E. borealis, E. borealis cavernosa, E. branchi, E. brevidens, E. budarini, E. burjatica, E. callida, E. capens, E. cavata comb. n., E. chitina, E. completa, E. completoides, E. consulta, E. cornupeta, E. coweta, E. crocana, E. decaprini, E. evicta, E. florens, E. formicaria, E. hentzi, E. horta, E. hoya, E. joaquina, E. lina, E. linda, E. manitoba, E. marissa, E. melva, E. nanda, E. oasa, E. palomara, E. pinalia, E. piratica, E. peragrata, E. reticulata, E. roscida, E. saylori, E. scotta, E. seminola, E. shasta, E. shoshonea, E. stulta, E. sublatoides, E. suwanea, and E. zaba), Eriena gen. n. (Er. minuta comb. n. and Er. mora comb. n.), Helenactyna, Khalotyna gen. n. (K. calcarata comb. n.), Kharitonovia, Mallos, Marilynia, Mashimo, Mexitlia, Myanmardictyna, Nigma, Nopalityna gen. n. (N. francisca comb. n., N. jonesae comb. n., N. orbiculata comb. n., N. sublata comb. n., N. suprenans comb. n., and N. uintana comb. n.), Pangunus gen. n. (Pa. kaszabi comb. n., Pa. umai comb. n., and Pa. xizangensis comb. n.), Paradictyna, Penangodyna, Phantyna, (Ph. agressa comb. n. and Ph. formidolosa comb. n.), Purplecorna gen. n. (Pu. gloria comb. n., Pu. guerrerensis comb. n., Pu. incredula comb. n., Pu. lecta comb. n., Pu. meditata comb. n., Pu. miniata comb. n., and Pu. terrestris comb. n.), Rhion, Shango, Shikibutyna gen. n. (Sh. felis comb. n., Sh. follicola comb. n., Sh. guanchae comb. n., Sh. mongolica comb. n., Sh. procerula comb. n., Sh. schmidti comb. n., Sh. szaboi comb. n., Sh. wangi comb. n., Sh. xizangensis comb. n., and Sh. zherikhini comb. n.), Simziella gen. n. (Si. annexa comb. n., Si. cebolla comb. n., Si. dunini comb. n., Si. major comb. n., Si. palmgreni comb. n., Si. paramajor comb. n., Si. sancta comb. n., Si. sotnik comb. n., Si. sylvania comb. n., Si. tridentata comb. n., Si. tucsona comb. n., Si. tyshchenkoi comb. n., Si. tyshchenkoi wrangeliana comb. n., Si. canadas comb. n., and Si. teideensis comb. n.), Spagnius gen. n. (Sp. albopilosa comb. n., Sp. foliacea comb. n., Sp. jacalana comb. n., and Sp. nebraska comb. n.), Sudesna, Tahuantina, Thallumetus, Tivyna (Ti. sonora comb. n.), Tolkienus gen. n. (Tolkienus armatus comb. n., Tolkienus bellans comb. n., Tolkienus bellans hatchi comb. n., Tolkienus estoc sp. n., Tolkienus ottoi comb. n., and Tolkienus longispina comb. n.), and Viridictyna. This study begins to remedy the dearth of systematic knowledge about this incredibly diverse spider group and fills knowledge gaps in the tree of life for little brown spiders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZoological Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207