MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411022811 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.05.042

Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex functional connectivity abnormalities in depression: insights from brain imaging big data and precision-guided personalized intervention via transcranial magnetic stimulation

2025· article· en· W4411022811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Sichuan ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Postdoctoral Program for Innovative TalentsChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationBeijing Nova ProgramNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthChina Scholarship CouncilChinese Academy of SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationMajor depressive disorderAnterior cingulate cortexNeuroscienceDorsolateral prefrontal cortexPsychologyNeuroimagingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPrefrontal cortexMedicineStimulationCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) plays a central role in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Its functional interactive profile with the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment outcomes. Previous research on sgACC functional connectivity (FC) in MDD has yielded inconsistent results, partly due to small sample sizes and limited statistical power. Furthermore, calculating sgACC-FC to target TMS individually is challenging. We used a large multi-site cross-sectional sample (1660 patients with MDD vs. 1341 healthy controls) from Phase II of the Depression Imaging REsearch ConsorTium (DIRECT) to systematically delineate case-control difference maps of sgACC-FC. We explored the potential impact of group-level abnormality profiles on TMS target localization and clinical efficacy. Next, we developed an MDD big data-guided, individualized TMS targeting algorithm to integrate group-level statistical maps with individual-level brain activity to individually localize TMS targets. We found enhanced sgACC-DLPFC FC in patients with MDD compared with healthy controls (HC). These group differences altered the position of the sgACC anti-correlation peak in the left DLPFC. We showed that the magnitude of case-control differences in the sgACC-FC was related to clinical improvement in two independent clinical samples. This targeting algorithm may generate targets demonstrating stronger associations with clinical efficiency than group-level targets. We reliably delineated MDD-related abnormalities of sgACC-FC profiles in a large, independently ascertained sample and demonstrated the potential impact of such case-control differences on FC-guided localization of TMS targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it