MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411028276 · doi:10.1007/s43678-025-00928-z

Health system utilization following medical advice from Alberta’s Virtual MD: a descriptive analysis

2025· article· en· W4411028276 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard Golonka, Mary V. Modayil, Fayaz Kurji, Jane Huang, Wei Zhao, Denise Watt, Jake Hayward, Patricia Chambers, Carolyn Grolman, Judy Seidel, Robin L. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health ServicesThe Metabolomics Innovation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdvice (programming)Descriptive statisticsDescriptive researchFamily medicineMedical educationMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Alberta's Virtual MD program was established to enhance nurse tele-triage and divert low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED). This study describes the use of Virtual MD and its impact on healthcare utilization. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics of Virtual MD patients were compared with Health Link 811 callers and the overall Alberta population between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. Virtual MD recommendations included seeing a primary care provider, going to ED/urgent care, and self-management at home. Concordance with recommendations was determined using linked health administrative data. RESULTS: Virtual MD patients (n = 19,312) had a mean age of 34.8 years and were mostly female (62.3%). Compared to Health Link 811 callers, Virtual MD patients were slightly older (≥ 55 years) (20.8% vs. 25.0%). Of patients called within 4 h, 55.7% visited primary care within 14 days as advised, 60.0% visited ED within 2 days as advised and 52.5% of those advised to self-manage care at home did not use any healthcare within 14 days. Those advised to seek primary care had a higher odds [OR = 1.65 (95%CI: 1.24-2.21)] of family practice-sensitive conditions when they presented at ED compared to those advised to seek ED care. Hospitalization within 2 weeks was lower for patients advised to see primary care compared to those advised to see ED [4 h callback: OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26 - 0.43), 24 h callback: OR = 0.15 (95%CI 0.08 - 0.28)]. CONCLUSION: Virtual MD effectively triaged patients, with over half following through on recommendations to see primary care, see ED, or self-manage care at home. Patients referred to primary care, but instead choosing to visit ED, were more likely to present with family practice-sensitive conditions, demonstrating appropriateness of the initial primary care advice. Overall, the Virtual MD service enables patients to access more appropriate levels of care for their healthcare needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine→Same topicEmergency and Acute Care Studies→French-language works237,207→