A randomized phase III trial of the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival (DFS) in stage 3 or high-risk stage 2 colon cancer: Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LBA3510 Background: Multiple observational studies have reported that post-diagnosis physical activity (PA) is associated with reduced recurrence rates in early-stage colon cancer but epidemiologic data is limited by confounding and reporting bias. CCTG CO.21 was designed to test the hypothesis that a meaningful increase in recreational PA after adjuvant therapy is achievable and will improve DFS in stage 3 or high-risk stage 2 colon cancer. Methods: CCTG CO.21 enrolled patients at 55 sites in 6 countries. Patients with resected stage 3 or high-risk stage 2 colon cancer who had received adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to a structured exercise program (SEP) or health education materials (HEM). HEM participants received education materials promoting PA and healthy nutrition in addition to standard surveillance. SEP participants worked with a PA consultant who delivered an exercise intervention using behavior change methodology over 3 years. The SEP goal was to increase recreational PA by at least 10 MET-hours/week from baseline during the first 6 months and sustain this for 3 years. Participants chose the type, frequency, intensity and duration of aerobic exercise. The primary endpoint is DFS compared by a stratified log-rank test performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes (SF-36 physical function scale was primary PRO). Results: Between 2009 and 2024,889 participants were randomized to SEP (n=445) or HEM (n=444); 51% female, median age 61 years, 90% stage 3 disease. Compared to HEM, SEP resulted in statistically significant improvements in recreational PA, predicted VO2max, and 6-minute walk distance, all maintained over the 3-year intervention period. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 224 DFS events (93 in SEP and 131 in HEM) and 107 deaths (41 in SEP and 66 in HEM) were observed. 5-year DFS was 80% in SEP and 74% in HEM (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.94; p=0.017). 8-year OS was 90% in SEP and 83% in HEM (HR=0.63; 95% CI=0.43-0.94; p=0.022). SF-36 physical function was substantially improved with SEP at 6 months (mean change scores 7.42 vs 1.10, p<0.001) and was sustained to 24 months. In the safety analysis, 19% (79/428) of patients on SEP reported any grade of musculoskeletal adverse event (MSK AE) over the course of the study, compared to 12% (50/433) on HEM. 10% (8/79) of MSK AE on SEP were considered to be related to participation in the PA program. Conclusions: Inpatients with stage 3 and high-risk stage 2 colon cancer, a 3-year structured exercise program initiated shortly after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy improves DFS, OS, patient-reported physical functioning, and health-related fitness. Health systems should incorporate structured exercise programs as standard of care for this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT00819208 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".