MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411030155 · doi:10.1002/ase.70046

Education Abstracts

2025· article· en· W4411030155 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAnatomical Sciences Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
KeywordsMedical educationPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The integration of basic sciences with clinical practice is essential in medical education.During a first-year anatomy dissection, our team discovered a spinal cord stimulator, which prompted a laminectomy to investigate its anatomical path.This project offered a unique opportunity to reinforce spinal anatomy knowledge while also fostering a curiosity to understand the clinical applications of SCS.Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a device considered in cases where other non-surgical forms of pain management have been ineffective, such as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and peripheral ischemia.Research Aim: To enrich medical students' understanding of surgical approaches to chronic pain management using SCS devices through anatomical dissection [laminectomy].Materials and Methods: Routine cadaveric dissections were performed by first-year medical students on 23 donors (11 female, 12 male).One male donor was identified with a subcutaneous implantable pulse generator located near the left iliac crest.A laminectomy was performed to trace the path of the device's electrodes from the pulse generator at the lumbar vertebrae to the thoracic vertebrae within the vertebral canal.Results: The laminectomy revealed two electrodes originating from the implantable pulse generator at the L3 level, traveling superiorly within the epidural space and terminating at the T8 level.Discussion: This rare finding, observed in only 1 out of 105 total donors over five years of the anatomy lab program, prompted further investigation.To further understand the device's mechanism of action, a literature review of SCS technology was conducted.This highlighted how pulsatile or persistent impulses from the generator act on pain signals traveling along the spinothalamic tracts, effectively replacing pain sensation with paresthesia.Significance and Implications: This discovery provided a unique opportunity to explore the clinical utility of SCS in surgical pain management beyond the scope of what would have been covered in first year medical education and allowed for fostering professional identity formation.Furthermore, utilization of the publication of this discovery could be explored as a similar academic tool for other medical students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnatomical Sciences EducationSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207