MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411035766 · doi:10.32782/bses.92-6

ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LOGISTICS PROCESSES AT FOREIGN ENTERPRISES

2025· article· en· W4411035766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlack Sea Economic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnterprise Management and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessIndustrial organizationProcess management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of the organization of logistics processes at foreign enterprises was studied using the World Bank's Logistics Performance Index. For this purpose, the following indicators of logistics performance were used: LPI score; international shipments; logistics competence; timeliness. The LPI score is an integrated comprehensive indicator that assesses the general condition of the enterprise's logistics processes; a high level of this indicator indicates well-established and developed logistics processes and high competitiveness in the world market. International shipments - this indicator determines the reliability and efficiency of export-import logistics processes. Logistics competence characterizes the efficiency of logistics processes, in particular, the competence of personnel performing logistics operations, reliability and efficiency in the storage and transportation of goods, as well as the level of customer service. The logistics competence indicator also depends on the use of modern technologies and automation of the enterprise's logistics processes. A high level of logistics competence increases the flexibility and speed of the enterprise's response to changes in logistics routes and the volume of deliveries by reducing operational risks and costs. Timeliness assesses the timing of logistics processes, the reliability and stability of delivery times, including during force majeure circumstances, and the level of interaction of all participants in the logistics process - suppliers, warehouse production, carriers, etc. An assessment of the state of logistics process organization at foreign enterprises in Europe, Asia, America and Africa for 2023 was carried out. Among European countries, seven countries with the highest LPI were selected for assessment: Finland, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium. It was determined that the leader in this group of countries is Finland. Among Asian countries, Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, China were selected for assessment. It was determined that the leader in this group of countries is Singapore. Among American countries, Canada, USA, Brazil, Panama, Chile, Peru, Uruguay were selected for assessment. It was determined that the leader in this group of countries is Canada. Among the African countries selected for assessment are South Africa, Botswana, Egypt, Benin, Namibia, Rwanda, Djibouti. It is determined that the leader in this group of countries is South Africa. It is proven that in 2023 the greatest development of logistics processes of foreign enterprises is observed among enterprises of European and Asian countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it