Machine Learning to Automatically Differentiate Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Cardiac Light Chain, and Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis: A Multicenter CMR Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis is associated with poor outcomes and is caused by the interstitial deposition of misfolded proteins, typically ATTR (transthyretin) or AL (light chains). Although specific therapies during early disease stages exist, the diagnosis is often only established at an advanced stage. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for imaging suspected myocardial disease. However, differentiating cardiac amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be challenging, and a reliable method for an image-based classification of amyloidosis subtypes is lacking. This study sought to investigate a CMR machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify and distinguish cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, multivendor feasibility study included consecutive patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or AL/ATTR amyloidosis and healthy volunteers. Standard clinical information, semiautomated CMR imaging data, and qualitative CMR features were integrated into a trained ML algorithm. RESULTS: Four hundred participants (95 healthy, 94 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 95 AL, and 116 ATTR) from 56 institutions were included (269 men aged 58.5 [48.4-69.4] years). A 3-stage ML screening cascade sequentially differentiated healthy volunteers from patients, then hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from amyloidosis, and then AL from ATTR. The ML algorithm resulted in an accurate differentiation at each step (area under the curve, 1.0, 0.99, and 0.92, respectively). After reducing included data to demographics and imaging data alone, the performance remained excellent (area under the curve, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.88, respectively), even after removing late gadolinium enhancement imaging data from the model (area under the curve, 1.0, 0.95, 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A trained ML model using semiautomated CMR imaging data and patient demographics can accurately identify cardiac amyloidosis and differentiate subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".